From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100921/000565.html | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100921/000565.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100921/000565.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100921/000565.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100921/000565.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4af59bf09 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100921/000565.html @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ + + + + [Mageia-discuss] [OT] pronounciation + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-discuss] [OT] pronounciation

+ Wolfgang Bornath + molch.b at googlemail.com +
+ Tue Sep 21 21:53:15 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
2010/9/21 P. Christeas <p_christ at hol.gr>:
+>
+> With a little remark there: mp3 had not been invented back at those times, so
+> nobody really knows what Hellenic ("greek"[1] ) sounded back in past. So we
+> presume that modern greek is the closest to the ancient language's
+> pronounciation [2]. It is interesting to search that historically, and there
+> has been many theories (like Erasmus's one, which you mention).
+
+Yes, of course. Same with all old languages. We can only go back from
+today's sound using old documents and overall statistic theories how
+languages change with the time, with foreign contacts and travelling,
+etc.
+
+Best sources are religous rites because they tend to cover long time
+spans without being changed. A good example is old Hebrew and
+Hellenic, languages which were used to write the first documents of
+our western religions.
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1