From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100921/000561.html | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100921/000561.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100921/000561.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100921/000561.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100921/000561.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7728ea2c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100921/000561.html @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ + + + + [Mageia-discuss] Mageia Forums + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-discuss] Mageia Forums

+ atilla ontas + tarakbumba at gmail.com +
+ Tue Sep 21 21:17:42 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
What about Debian or ArchLinux organisation scheme with users
+interaction? We can digg those to find a way of organisation. In my
+opinion, two should be three parts of a decision maker group. Call it
+assembly or whatever you want. First, members from Mageia developers
+(coders, packagers, web site and wiki developers etc.), members from
+local users communities.  I don't know who are the advocates as
+mentioned in announcement. If Mageia will be a community driven
+project and not a company product there must be community members in
+board. I think %50-%50 developer-community ratio is fine. Local
+communities should elect their representive by themselves. We can
+elect our representive for 2 years. Thats how i think the decision
+maker board should formed in.
+
+
+OFFTOPİC:  Mageia name is a bit weird for Turkish users. We even can't
+pronounce them like European language speakers. If someone asked me
+the distro name i'd rather prefer Magic Wand Linux...
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1