From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000
Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives

---
 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121031/653faf27/attachment-0001.html | 1 +
 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121031/653faf27/attachment.html      | 1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121031/653faf27/attachment-0001.html
 create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121031/653faf27/attachment.html

(limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121031/653faf27')

diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121031/653faf27/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121031/653faf27/attachment-0001.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3047109ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121031/653faf27/attachment-0001.html
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+<div><div>Please explain me why you want to change the current bind mount of sasl for postfix?&#160; What you propose?</div><div><br/></div><div><font style="color:#333333">Enviado desde mi DROID 4G LTE de Verizon Wireless</font></div></div><br><br>Olav Vitters &lt;olav@vitters.nl&gt; escribió:<br><br>On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 04:55:28PM +0000, Colin Guthrie wrote:<br>&gt; So, what should we do? Should we switch to bind mounts? Should we make<br>&gt; saslauthd/postfix use abstract sockets instead to get around the chroot?<br><br>bind mount for just saslauth seems cleanest to me. Don't bind mount<br>entire /run or /var/run, could impact security of the chroot somehow.<br><br>-- <br>Regards,<br>Olav<br>Email Shield provided by NOCWorldWide.com<br>
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121031/653faf27/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121031/653faf27/attachment.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3047109ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121031/653faf27/attachment.html
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+<div><div>Please explain me why you want to change the current bind mount of sasl for postfix?&#160; What you propose?</div><div><br/></div><div><font style="color:#333333">Enviado desde mi DROID 4G LTE de Verizon Wireless</font></div></div><br><br>Olav Vitters &lt;olav@vitters.nl&gt; escribió:<br><br>On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 04:55:28PM +0000, Colin Guthrie wrote:<br>&gt; So, what should we do? Should we switch to bind mounts? Should we make<br>&gt; saslauthd/postfix use abstract sockets instead to get around the chroot?<br><br>bind mount for just saslauth seems cleanest to me. Don't bind mount<br>entire /run or /var/run, could impact security of the chroot somehow.<br><br>-- <br>Regards,<br>Olav<br>Email Shield provided by NOCWorldWide.com<br>
\ No newline at end of file
-- 
cgit v1.2.1