From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- .../20120220/a2256abf/attachment-0001.html | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120220/a2256abf/attachment-0001.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120220/a2256abf/attachment-0001.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120220/a2256abf/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120220/a2256abf/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d82404a6a --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120220/a2256abf/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ + + + + + + On 19.02.2012 23:52, Funda Wang wrote: +

+

+ 在 2012-2-20 上午6:42，"Kamil Rytarowski" <n54@gmx.com> + 写道：
+ >
+ > Hello!
+ >
+ > 1.
+ > What is the right implementation of an installation of + *.desktop files? I saw every possible way of adding + (build)require on desktop-file-utils. Is it necessary? What is + the best way to implement it (of course in case of a mandatory + requirement).
+ Most software will install .desktop files themselves. In case + we need to modify the menu categories, we often use + desktop-file-install.
+
> 2.
+ > Is allowed to use macros from jpackage-utils (the file name + is/etc/rpm/macros.jpackage ) in a simple, normal non-java + application? If yes, then is mandatory to add a buildrequirement + of this package?
+ I think yes and yes. There are some packages BR kde4-macros, but + they have no relation with KDE4.
+ > Regards
+
+

+ Thank you Funda!
+ + -- cgit v1.2.1