From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org> Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- .../20111115/35e00be6/attachment-0001.html | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../attachments/20111115/35e00be6/attachment.html | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20111115/35e00be6/attachment-0001.html create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20111115/35e00be6/attachment.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20111115/35e00be6') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20111115/35e00be6/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20111115/35e00be6/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0fbc1e28e --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20111115/35e00be6/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"> +<html><body> +<p>On 11/11/2011 10:17, Maarten Vanraes wrote:</p> +<blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px; border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px; width:100%"><!-- html ignored --><!-- head ignored --><!-- meta ignored --> +<pre>... +A. provide both but with vendor preference +making sure one of them both is preferred should be ok, since they conflict +anyway, if a user installs the non-preferred one, she knows what she's doing. +( I think a note could be added here for warning purposes ) + +B. only use mariadb anymore +=> That's the easiest and safest option... +_IF_ mariadb works well. (which i'm sure we'll see in our testing) +(IMHO, if it worked for libreoffice, i don't see why not for mariadb) + + +any opinions? testings? problems? +</pre> +</blockquote> +<p>I'm all for either of these. Especially B) if we can test it well enough.</p> +<p>I rebuilt the package on mga1 without issues. Tests fine as well.</p> +<p>Does anyone have any idea if the PBXT (Primebase) Storage Engine will be kept in MariaDB 5.5 (as it is in 5.1, 5.2, 5.3)?</p> +<div> +<pre>-- +Sam Bailey + +Cyprix Enterprises +Web: cyprix.com.au +Em: cyprix@cyprix.com.au +Mb: 0425 796 308</pre> +</div> +</body></html> diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20111115/35e00be6/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20111115/35e00be6/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0fbc1e28e --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20111115/35e00be6/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"> +<html><body> +<p>On 11/11/2011 10:17, Maarten Vanraes wrote:</p> +<blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px; border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px; width:100%"><!-- html ignored --><!-- head ignored --><!-- meta ignored --> +<pre>... +A. provide both but with vendor preference +making sure one of them both is preferred should be ok, since they conflict +anyway, if a user installs the non-preferred one, she knows what she's doing. +( I think a note could be added here for warning purposes ) + +B. only use mariadb anymore +=> That's the easiest and safest option... +_IF_ mariadb works well. (which i'm sure we'll see in our testing) +(IMHO, if it worked for libreoffice, i don't see why not for mariadb) + + +any opinions? testings? problems? +</pre> +</blockquote> +<p>I'm all for either of these. Especially B) if we can test it well enough.</p> +<p>I rebuilt the package on mga1 without issues. Tests fine as well.</p> +<p>Does anyone have any idea if the PBXT (Primebase) Storage Engine will be kept in MariaDB 5.5 (as it is in 5.1, 5.2, 5.3)?</p> +<div> +<pre>-- +Sam Bailey + +Cyprix Enterprises +Web: cyprix.com.au +Em: cyprix@cyprix.com.au +Mb: 0425 796 308</pre> +</div> +</body></html> -- cgit v1.2.1