From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- .../20110614/27b02af6/attachment-0001.html | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ .../attachments/20110614/27b02af6/attachment.html | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110614/27b02af6/attachment-0001.html create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110614/27b02af6/attachment.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110614/27b02af6') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110614/27b02af6/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110614/27b02af6/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..80ee8a859 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110614/27b02af6/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +

2011/6/14 Christiaan Welvaart <cjw@daneel.dyndns.org>
+
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Thorsten van Lil wrote:
+
+
+I don't want a full rolling release, because of the listed disadvantages. So, if you ask me what is "wrong" with Arch, I would say:
+* due to the rolling release, it's nearly vanilla. This doesn't match requirements of Mageia
+* no innovations (because of vanilla)
+* a rolling core system has a negative correlation with it's stability
+* heavy work load
+* ...
+
+So, I don't ask for a copy of Arch nor any other distribution. I asked (although it wasn't my idea) for something new. An compromise: a light rolling release.
+
+
+This is exactly what release + updates + backports can be, the only requirement is enough people to do the work. I do not understand what people are saying about backports being "unsupported". IMHO we should either have backports that are supported, with fixes for security issues and important bugs, or no backports.
+

I guess because of Mandriva policy. We did provide backports but it was explicitely said to be unsupported. "Use it at your own risks"
We may have to rewrite  this and make things clear
+
+
+
+    Christiaan
+



--
Anne
http://www.mageia.org
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110614/27b02af6/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110614/27b02af6/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..80ee8a859 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110614/27b02af6/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +

2011/6/14 Christiaan Welvaart <cjw@daneel.dyndns.org>
+
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Thorsten van Lil wrote:
+
+
+I don't want a full rolling release, because of the listed disadvantages. So, if you ask me what is "wrong" with Arch, I would say:
+* due to the rolling release, it's nearly vanilla. This doesn't match requirements of Mageia
+* no innovations (because of vanilla)
+* a rolling core system has a negative correlation with it's stability
+* heavy work load
+* ...
+
+So, I don't ask for a copy of Arch nor any other distribution. I asked (although it wasn't my idea) for something new. An compromise: a light rolling release.
+
+
+This is exactly what release + updates + backports can be, the only requirement is enough people to do the work. I do not understand what people are saying about backports being "unsupported". IMHO we should either have backports that are supported, with fixes for security issues and important bugs, or no backports.
+

I guess because of Mandriva policy. We did provide backports but it was explicitely said to be unsupported. "Use it at your own risks"
We may have to rewrite  this and make things clear
+
+
+
+    Christiaan
+



--
Anne
http://www.mageia.org
-- cgit v1.2.1