From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-March/023491.html | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-March/023491.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-March/023491.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-March/023491.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-March/023491.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..bfb5f1c06 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-March/023491.html @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] No package named nss_ldap + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] No package named nss_ldap

+ Colin Guthrie + mageia at colin.guthr.ie +
+ Thu Mar 14 01:15:20 CET 2013 +

+
+ +
'Twas brillig, and Olivier Blin at 13/03/13 23:55 did gyre and gimble:
+> Colin Guthrie <mageia at colin.guthr.ie> writes:
+> 
+>> 'Twas brillig, and R James at 13/03/13 21:48 did gyre and gimble:
+>>> I'd like to test LDAP client authentication hit a roadblock:
+>>>
+>>> [root at localhost ~]# urpmi pam_ldap
+>>> A requested package cannot be installed:
+>>> pam_ldap-186-4.mga3.x86_64 (due to unsatisfied nss_ldap[>= 217])
+>>> Continue installation anyway? (Y/n) n
+> 
+> [...]
+> 
+>> It's been reported before, but basically the solution is to not use
+>> nss_ldap or pam_ldap but alternative packages nss-pam-ldapd and sssd.
+> 
+> Shouldn't we drop pam_ldap then?
+
+Yup that too.
+
+Col
+
+
+-- 
+
+Colin Guthrie
+colin(at)mageia.org
+http://colin.guthr.ie/
+
+Day Job:
+  Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/
+Open Source:
+  Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/
+  PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/
+  Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1