From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-March/023478.html | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 151 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-March/023478.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-March/023478.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-March/023478.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-March/023478.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4ac3025da --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-March/023478.html @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] RFC: Patch e2fsprogs to not print the "clean" message on fsck. + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] RFC: Patch e2fsprogs to not print the "clean" message on fsck.

+ AL13N + alien at rmail.be +
+ Wed Mar 13 20:25:04 CET 2013 +

+
+ +
same thing with brtfsck
+
+Op woensdag 13 maart 2013 14:03:02 schreef Colin Guthrie:
+> 'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 13/03/13 12:35 did gyre and gimble:
+> > Hi,
+> > 
+> > I would like to propose that we push a patch to e2fsprogs to make it not
+> > print out the "clean" message when it checks the filesystem.
+> > 
+> > In my current boot (which is an experiment without initrds), it prints
+> > this message over the top of plymouth and stays during the nice fade
+> > transition to gdm and generally makes the boot ugly.
+> > 
+> > I believe only the e2fsprogs print this message and the others do not
+> > e.g. see this comparison with XFS:
+> > 
+> > [root at jimmy ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=xfs.img bs=1M count=100 >/dev/null
+> > 2>&1; mkfs.xfs xfs.img >/dev/null 2>&1; xfs_check xfs.img
+> > [root at jimmy ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=ext4.img bs=1M count=100 >/dev/null
+> > 2>&1; mkfs.ext4 -F ext4.img >/dev/null 2>&1; fsck.ext4 -a ext4.img
+> > ext4.img: clean, 11/25688 files, 8896/102400 blocks
+> > 
+> > 
+> > 
+> > My patch would propose to not print the "clean" message when the -a
+> > option was passed. This is similar logic which prevents showing the
+> > version when -a is passed.
+> > 
+> > I've not tested this but I will before committing if no-one disapproves
+> > of this approach.
+> > 
+> > --- e2fsprogs-1.42.7/e2fsck/unix.c.orig	2013-03-13 10:57:22.349126868
+> > +0000
+> > +++ e2fsprogs-1.42.7/e2fsck/unix.c	2013-03-13 12:33:08.340522834 +0000
+> > @@ -421,13 +421,14 @@
+> > 
+> >  	}
+> >  	
+> >  	/* Print the summary message when we're skipping a full check */
+> > 
+> > -	log_out(ctx, _("%s: clean, %u/%u files, %llu/%llu blocks"),
+> > -		ctx->device_name,
+> > -		fs->super->s_inodes_count - fs->super->s_free_inodes_count,
+> > -		fs->super->s_inodes_count,
+> > -		ext2fs_blocks_count(fs->super) -
+> > -		ext2fs_free_blocks_count(fs->super),
+> > -		ext2fs_blocks_count(fs->super));
+> > +	if (!(ctx->options & E2F_OPT_PREEN))
+> > +		log_out(ctx, _("%s: clean, %u/%u files, %llu/%llu blocks"),
+> > +			ctx->device_name,
+> > +			fs->super->s_inodes_count - fs->super->s_free_inodes_count,
+> > +			fs->super->s_inodes_count,
+> > +			ext2fs_blocks_count(fs->super) -
+> > +			ext2fs_free_blocks_count(fs->super),
+> > +			ext2fs_blocks_count(fs->super));
+> > 
+> >  	next_check = 100000;
+> >  	if (fs->super->s_max_mnt_count > 0) {
+> >  	
+> >  		next_check = fs->super->s_max_mnt_count - fs->super-
+>s_mnt_count;
+> 
+> FWIW, this patch is a bit wrong (as it still prints out a newline and
+> some other fluff about when the next check is etc.) and it causes a test
+> to fail.
+> 
+> But an updated and tested patch fixes it up. If there are no complaints,
+> I'll push it.
+> 
+> Cheers
+> 
+> Col
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1