From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022238.html | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022238.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022238.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022238.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022238.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e1da72341 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022238.html @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] [council] *ping* Media query: secure boot support + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] [council] *ping* Media query: secure boot support

+ Olav Vitters + olav at vitters.nl +
+ Wed Jan 30 09:17:51 CET 2013 +

+
+ +
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 08:19:19PM +0200, Thomas Backlund wrote:
+> Olav Vitters skrev 29.1.2013 14:40:
+> >In which case I'd just turn secure boot off? Same for all the other
+> >examples. Maybe it at one point it has to be disabled, but at the moment
+> >that is not the case and it provides something useful.
+> >
+> 
+> and if the hw vendor has not implemented a way to turn it off...
+
+Then I couldn't even install Mageia? I doubt Secure Boot would be
+impossible to turn off, as then you cannot have a "designed for Windows
+8" sticker on it plus nobody could install an older Windows version. My
+only worry if it would turn off UEFI at the same time or not.
+
+-- 
+Regards,
+Olav
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1