From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022206.html | 152 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 152 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022206.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022206.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022206.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022206.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ee39cd18d --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/022206.html @@ -0,0 +1,152 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] [council] *ping* Media query: secure boot support + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] [council] *ping* Media query: secure boot support

+ Colin Guthrie + mageia at colin.guthr.ie +
+ Tue Jan 29 12:58:40 CET 2013 +

+
+ +
'Twas brillig, and Thomas Backlund at 29/01/13 11:50 did gyre and gimble:
+> Colin Guthrie skrev 29.1.2013 11:30:
+>> 'Twas brillig, and Thomas Backlund at 29/01/13 09:11 did gyre and gimble:
+>>> Olav Vitters skrev 29.1.2013 10:43:
+>>>> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 01:43:25PM +0100, Marja van Waes wrote:
+>>>>>> From: Sam Varghese<sam at gnubies.com>
+>>>> [..]
+>>>>>> I would like to know what Mageia plans to do about secure boot - when
+>>>>>> you will have a release that supports booting on hardware on which
+>>>>>> this
+>>>>>> feature is enabled.
+>>>>
+>>>> I'm wondering as well. I've been thinking to upgrade my system
+>>>> somewhere
+>>>> this year. This means secure boot, UEFI, etc. It would be nice if
+>>>> Mageia
+>>>> supports that nicely.
+>>>>
+>>>
+>>> Supporting (U)EFI does not require SecureBoot support...
+>>>
+>>> we wont support SecureBoot for Mga3, and there is no rush considering
+>>> a lot of changes is still happening on several fronts...
+>>>
+>>> I will try to see if I can fix the UEFI part for ~beta3, but no promises
+>>> yet....
+>>>
+>>> And for people thinking of Windows 8 dual boot... Win8 does not
+>>> _require_ SecureBoot either... (only the overprized RT does)
+>>>
+>>>
+>>> And personally, I dont think we should ever bother with the SecureBoot
+>>> crap as its flawed in so many ways...
+>>
+>> On a semi-related note, it would be nice to package gummiboot although I
+>> have no h/w to test it on.
+>>
+> 
+> Yep, that is one of the things I'm looking at...
+
+Cool :)
+
+>> For mga4 it might make sense to integrate it (assuming it's still a good
+>> solution) properly into our tools.
+>>
+>> Personally, I'm going to avoid grub2. It seems insane to me to implement
+>> all kinds of exotic filesystem supoort and even md stuff in a
+>> bootloader...
+> 
+> 
+> Well, I think for next 3.8 kernel build I think I will make ahci, ext4
+> and btrfs builtin so you can boot without initrd on new hw, and if you
+> install the kernel in correct place on the "efi" partition, you can
+> boot the kernel directly without bootloader... :)
+
+Yup, with newer systemds (not yet in mga - think it's probably best to
+wait for mga4, but I could backport those bits if there is sufficient
+interest), if you have an EFI partition and you have an empty /boot
+folder with no other /boot mounts defined, it'll automatically mount the
+efi partition there.
+
+This is where I think our tools would need updating to realise this was
+the case and use the correct vendor subdir for kernel (and optional
+initrd) installation. Will likely take a bit of fiddling to get right,
+hence why I think this is really an mga4 thing for the most part.
+
+Col
+
+-- 
+
+Colin Guthrie
+colin(at)mageia.org
+http://colin.guthr.ie/
+
+Day Job:
+  Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/
+Open Source:
+  Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/
+  PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/
+  Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1