From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/021787.html | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/021787.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/021787.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/021787.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/021787.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e3678ff64 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/021787.html @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Grub2 vs. Grub Legacy in M3 (was: Feedback on Mageia 3 beta1) + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Grub2 vs. Grub Legacy in M3 (was: Feedback on Mageia 3 beta1)

+ Donald Stewart + watersnowrock at gmail.com +
+ Fri Jan 18 13:51:50 CET 2013 +

+
+ +
On 18 January 2013 12:42, Maurice Batey <maurice at bcs.org.uk> wrote:
+> On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:09:41 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
+>
+>> As Grub2 devs all but insist Grub2 must be installed to the MBR,
+>
+>   I had overlooked that restriction. Another black mark for GRUB2...
+>
+>> it is not yet a viable option for me as a Grub Legacy replacement,
+>
+>    +1
+>
+> --
+> /\/\aurice
+>
+>
+
+The above reason don't apply to me that much, however, my experience
+with grub2 and the general installation of other OS's ala Fedora 18 i
+have found the process to be far more complex the Mageia's offering. I
+feel that we should stay with grub-legacy until such a point where the
+install looks as smooth as it does with grub-legacy.
+
+>From an artwork point of view, I find it to also be a blocker for this
+as we still don't have the background for MGA3, and I don't know if we
+have anyone who can do the processing required for grub2....
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1