From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/021185.html | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 108 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/021185.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/021185.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/021185.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/021185.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b35f1e0ab --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-January/021185.html @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release ppp-2.4.5-11.mga3 + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release ppp-2.4.5-11.mga3

+ Johnny A. Solbu + cooker at solbu.net +
+ Sun Jan 6 19:16:32 CET 2013 +

+
+ +
On Sunday 6. January 2013 11.57, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
+> In spec file.
+> This ensures we end with both obsoletes & provides tags
+
+The reason I didn't do that, is that I think it might not obsolete te current version, as the «replacement package» have an «older» vversion number than te one being obsoleted.
+Specifically, rp-pppoe-plugin have version 3.10, but ppp-pppoe that's replacing it have version 2.4.5. So the %rename tag will not even obsolete a 12 year old package. (rp-pppoe v2.5 was released in 2000)
+
+That is how I've understood the %rename tag.
+So the way I see it, I should just add a Provides tag.
+
+-- 
+Johnny A. Solbu
+PGP key ID: 0xFA687324
+-------------- next part --------------
+A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
+Name: not available
+Type: application/pgp-signature
+Size: 190 bytes
+Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
+URL: </pipermail/mageia-dev/attachments/20130106/eb5fffe7/attachment.asc>
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1