From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-February/022983.html | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 135 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-February/022983.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-February/022983.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-February/022983.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-February/022983.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..eeab9a756 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-February/022983.html @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Fail2Ban vs Blockhosts vs DenyHosts vs iptable throttle for SSH + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Fail2Ban vs Blockhosts vs DenyHosts vs iptable throttle for SSH

+ Claire Robinson + eeeemail at gmail.com +
+ Tue Feb 19 17:43:56 CET 2013 +

+
+ +
On 19/02/13 12:51, finid at linuxbsdos.com wrote:
+> 
+> 
+> On 2013-02-19 11:45, Robert Fox wrote:
+>> On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 12:35 +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
+>>> Le 19/02/2013 12:20, finid at linuxbsdos.com a écrit :
+>>> > If that's how you feel about having a program like DenyHosts
+>>> running by
+>>> > default, do you feel the same way about having a firewall running and
+>>> > configured out of the box.
+>>> >
+>>> > Is a firewall a sysadmin's or packager's choice?
+>>> A sysadmin choice. Pushing always more stuff 'by default' doesn't help
+>>> users to make educated choices.
+>>
+>> On one hand I agree, on the other hand - we want a distribution which
+>> simply works and common choices are made (like which firewall) from the
+>> distro side - a good enough Sysadmin can then change to his/her liking
+>> afterwards.  This is more or less a distro "philosophy" question, but
+>> look why "Mint" has become so popular - because many choices are made
+>> upfront for the user - yet the flexibility is in the system (and enough
+>> packages) for an advanced user to change them!
+>>
+>> As long as the default settings are documented upfront - I see no issue
+>> in making such a decision on behalf of the "average" user - and making a
+>> more security robust distribution.
+>>
+>> BTW, there is no Mageia package for BlockHosts - but fail2ban and
+>> DenyHosts there are packages . . .
+>>
+> 
+> This is the point that many distro devs don't seem to understand. People
+> want a system that just works. Have you observed that Macs are very
+> popular with geeks, that is, the guys who can mess with a system in and
+> out. Why?
+> 
+> How did Ubuntu and Mint become so popular? That's right, they just work.
+> All the sane options have been pre-selected.
+> 
+> I once had a discussion with a dev who did not want to have the updates
+> manager's icon in the systray because he did not want to clutter that
+> part of the panel.
+> 
+> 
+> -- 
+> finid
+> 
+
+
+With this in mind could somebody mind looking at bugs 8985, 8986, 8987
+and possibly also 9107.
+
+https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8985
+https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8986
+https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8987
+https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9107
+
+T.I.A.
+
+Claire
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1