From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-February/022972.html | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 129 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-February/022972.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-February/022972.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-February/022972.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-February/022972.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..996ff7ca1 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-February/022972.html @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Fail2Ban vs Blockhosts vs DenyHosts vs iptable throttle for SSH + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Fail2Ban vs Blockhosts vs DenyHosts vs iptable throttle for SSH

+ Colin Guthrie + mageia at colin.guthr.ie +
+ Tue Feb 19 13:13:45 CET 2013 +

+
+ +
'Twas brillig, and Robert Fox at 19/02/13 11:45 did gyre and gimble:
+> On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 12:35 +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
+>> Le 19/02/2013 12:20, finid at linuxbsdos.com a écrit :
+>>> If that's how you feel about having a program like DenyHosts running by
+>>> default, do you feel the same way about having a firewall running and
+>>> configured out of the box.
+>>>
+>>> Is a firewall a sysadmin's or packager's choice?
+>> A sysadmin choice. Pushing always more stuff 'by default' doesn't help 
+>> users to make educated choices.
+> 
+> On one hand I agree, on the other hand - we want a distribution which
+> simply works and common choices are made (like which firewall) from the
+> distro side - a good enough Sysadmin can then change to his/her liking
+> afterwards.  This is more or less a distro "philosophy" question, but
+> look why "Mint" has become so popular - because many choices are made
+> upfront for the user - yet the flexibility is in the system (and enough
+> packages) for an advanced user to change them!
+> 
+> As long as the default settings are documented upfront - I see no issue
+> in making such a decision on behalf of the "average" user - and making a
+> more security robust distribution.
+
+Yup, I agree with this.
+
+I'm know my way around sufficiently that I can happily change the stuff
+I don't like.
+
+I think we do have to pick reasonably sensible defaults. Ultimately
+that's what msec does too - defines sensible defaults for the security
+level picked.
+
+So overall I'd welcome a default setup that allows things to be more
+secure/robust by default (obviously balanced against user experience -
+e.g. a *very* secure setup would be to ban all traffic in or out... but
+that's not a nice user experience :D).
+
+Col
+
+-- 
+
+Colin Guthrie
+colin(at)mageia.org
+http://colin.guthr.ie/
+
+Day Job:
+  Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/
+Open Source:
+  Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/
+  PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/
+  Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1