From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-September/018469.html | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 105 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-September/018469.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-September/018469.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-September/018469.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-September/018469.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..60740c6b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-September/018469.html @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] [soft-commits] [5642] skip packages with no name + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] [soft-commits] [5642] skip packages with no name

+ Colin Guthrie + mageia at colin.guthr.ie +
+ Wed Sep 5 10:03:47 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
'Twas brillig, and Pascal Terjan at 04/09/12 17:57 did gyre and gimble:
+> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Romain d'Alverny <rdalverny at gmail.com> wrote:
+>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Thierry Vignaud
+>> <thierry.vignaud at gmail.com> wrote:
+>>> On 4 September 2012 16:11,  <root at mageia.org> wrote:
+>>>> Revision 5642 Author rda Date 2012-09-04 16:11:36 +0200 (Tue, 04 Sep 2012)
+>>>>
+>>>> Log Message
+>>>>
+>>>> skip packages with no name
+>>>
+>>> Is that possible?
+>>
+>> Well, I am guilty of not having checked further why, but it happens
+>> that at the end of the list of packages being built, we used to have
+>> all the info, except the package name. So it may be that it was
+>> mis-parsed, but why on these specific occurrences? is it related to
+>> the fact that it's "old packages" (submitted about 48 hours before)
+>> and that some parts of the related files were already removed?
+> 
+> It is related, files are not removed but to get information we do a
+> find of files with a limit on mtime, so we are missing some
+> information if they were submitted over 2 days ago but built less than
+> 2 days ago
+> 
+>> By the way, there are some builds that get a strangely reported build
+>> duration (15588 days; always the same value when it occurs). I didn't
+>> investigate yet.
+
+So 15588 would be days since epoch. I guess it's the same as Pascal's
+comment. If it was submitted over 2 days ago we might not read the
+submit time and it ends up getting a timestamp of 0 and thus 15588 days
+to build.
+
+Col
+
+
+-- 
+
+Colin Guthrie
+colin(at)mageia.org
+http://colin.guthr.ie/
+
+Day Job:
+  Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/
+Open Source:
+  Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/
+  PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/
+  Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1