[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue

Tue Oct 30 20:12:59 CET 2012

Op dinsdag 30 oktober 2012 02:32:03 schreef Johnny A. Solbu:
+> On Tuesday 30 October 2012 02:11, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
+> > 2012/10/30 Olivier Blin <mageia at blino.org>:
+> > > Wolfgang Bornath <molch.b at googlemail.com> writes:
+> > >> There has been a wide consensus for the solution to put it into
+> > >> tainted as has been said in this thread as well.
+> > > 
+> > > The consensus was maybe not so clear then.
+> > 
+> > Maybe not so clear for those whose opinion differs from the consensus,
+> > understandable. I did not write about a consensus as first one, it has
+> > been written repeatedly by others.
+> 
+> Perhaps there is beneficial for the community to establish, what is a
+> «concensus» and how is it reached? No, really.
+> I am starting to think that what I think it means, means something else to
+> other people. Perhaps there is a cultral difference in play. I understand
+> it to man that a desition is reached by seeking concent from all parties.
+> Where not everyone agree with the choice. but agree to abide by it.
+> 
+> If my understanding is correct, there is no concensus yet, because not
+> everyone accept the solution proposed by the majority. And everyone doesn't
+> seem to agree or know how one decides what the concensus is. ... Unless I
+> missed something, which I might have :-)=
+
+how about just doing a quick vote for packaging team, that could be a 
+consensus:
+
+no need to trouble board or council with something so ridiculous... 
+bikeshedding anyone?
+
+we have the voting thing, just set one up for a few days: 
+have A, B, C and D on it, and let it be multiple possibilities, for me that 
+would be all of the above.
+
+that could clearly show a consensus
+