From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019174.html | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019174.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019174.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019174.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019174.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f599f627b --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019174.html @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue

+ Christian Lohmaier + lohmaier+mageia at googlemail.com +
+ Wed Oct 3 19:59:44 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Guillaume Rousse
+<guillomovitch at gmail.com> wrote:
+>
+> OK, let's vote here:
+> - how many people for using 'tainted' ?
+> - how many people for using 'non-free' ?
+
+Definitely vote for tainted.
+
+The only question is whether packages that depend on tainted stuff as
+a hard/non-optional dependency need to be themselves in tainted.
+
+I don't care, but this is the next thing to consider.
+Having stuff in free (and thus enabled for selection/installation by
+default) depending on stuff from tainted (and thus non-installable,
+since the media is not enabled/not checked for availability) might be
+more problematic than having those packages in tainted.
+
+ciao
+Christian
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1