From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019127.html | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019127.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019127.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019127.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019127.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..89de82169 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019127.html @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue

+ James Kerr + jim at jkerr82508.free-online.co.uk +
+ Tue Oct 2 15:24:20 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
On 02/10/2012 13:58, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
+> 2012/10/2 James Kerr <jim at jkerr82508.free-online.co.uk>:
+>> On 02/10/2012 12:26, Frank Griffin wrote:
+>>
+>>> At least for my part, I always viewed tainted as being the equivalent of
+>>> PLF,
+>>
+>>
+>> PLF had both free and non-free repo's.
+>>
+>> If you include both free and non-free in tainted, which is probably the
+>> "least bad" solution, then there needs to be a way for FOSS enthusiasts (who
+>> choose to do so) to avoid the non-free packages - perhaps a statement in the
+>> package description would suffice.
+>
+> Well, are you saying that tainted includes free packages although they
+> are subject to a patent?
+
+Yes. Those are the only packages that are included at present in 
+tainted. The fact that a package includes software that may be 
+encumbered by patent claims does not make it non-free.
+
+Jim
+
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1