From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019121.html | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019121.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019121.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019121.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019121.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..927e71bec --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-October/019121.html @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] rehashing the faac issue

+ Frank Griffin + ftg at roadrunner.com +
+ Tue Oct 2 13:26:38 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
On 10/02/2012 04:03 AM, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
+>
+> Given the importance of this package for several multimedia-related 
+> software (it is a mandatory dependency for cinerella, for instance), I 
+> think it's time to revisit this decision, and rather look for a 
+> pragmatic solution rather than a merely bureaucratic one.
+
+I read the links, but I think the discussion would benefit from a 
+statement of exactly why people don't want nonfree software in tainted.
+
+At least for my part, I always viewed tainted as being the equivalent of 
+PLF, i. e. we'll put this stuff in there because it's legal where we 
+are, and you decide whether you want to mirror it and make your own 
+decision as to whether you want to use it.  I thought the whole point 
+was to segregate tainted stuff from everything else so that mirror 
+maintainers could avoid tainted yet still mirror the mainstream repos.
+
+If that's true, and tainted is just a dumping ground for stuff that we 
+have legal or philosophical problems putting anywhere else, then I don't 
+get the free/nonfree issue.
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1