From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020406.html | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020406.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020406.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020406.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020406.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d02100152 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020406.html @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] GStreamer packaging (was: Re: rpmsrate-raw changes related to GNOME) + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] GStreamer packaging (was: Re: rpmsrate-raw changes related to GNOME)

+ Thierry Vignaud + thierry.vignaud at gmail.com +
+ Thu Nov 29 13:30:20 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
On 26 November 2012 16:15, Colin Guthrie <mageia at colin.guthr.ie> wrote:
+> Just a followup to this and some other gst related discussions of late,
+> should we perhaps think about simplifying the gstreamer packaging a bit.
+>
+> We're quite subpackage-y at the moment. I accept this allows to keep an
+> install minimal and avoids pulling in dependant libs etc, but I think in
+> 95-99% (guess) of cases, this isn't needed.
+>
+> e.g. it's pretty much impossible these days to install things without
+> libpulse, so why bother separating out the gst-pulse plugin from -good
+> generally? Likewise for several other containers and codecs.
+>
+> Maybe just something to do with the gst1.0 packages - a fresh start?
+
+should be done for both IMHO
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1