From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020240.html | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020240.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020240.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020240.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020240.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..aed7ae392 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020240.html @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] what is this ???? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] what is this ????

+ Frank Griffin + ftg at roadrunner.com +
+ Sat Nov 24 22:16:40 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
On 11/24/2012 02:59 PM, AL13N wrote:
+> I'm not following 100%, does this mean there are already quite 
+> specific usecases for this?
+
+This is conceptually no different than someone offering to pay a 
+developer to engineer a change to a Mageia package for himself. It's 
+open-source, so what's the problem ?   Unless he tries to distribute it, 
+there's no violation.
+
+Whether it gets included in the official distribution is up to us. 
+Whether the developer wants to submit the change to upstream (if there 
+*is* an upstream) is up to him.  Whether we want to do the same if he 
+doesn't (assuming we've accepted it) is up to us.
+
+I don't accept that this drains effort away from the distro.  If we had 
+significant interest in expending our own effort to do whatever he wants 
+done, we'd have done it.  If we don't, we lose nothing in terms of 
+community effort by letting him do it.
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1