From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020120.html | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020120.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020120.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020120.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020120.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..179093694 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020120.html @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] ANN: shadow-utils & util-linux with new default paths in testing + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] ANN: shadow-utils & util-linux with new default paths in testing

+ Thierry Vignaud + thierry.vignaud at gmail.com +
+ Wed Nov 21 02:57:32 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
On 21 November 2012 01:59, Colin Guthrie <mageia at colin.guthr.ie> wrote:
+>>>   PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin for normal user,
+>>>   PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin for root.
+>>
+>> Mmmm, this is a discussion I always had with my sysadmin at work...
+>> Do you really want that a binary in local can oerride one in system ?
+>> Should not local paths be after system ones ?
+>
+> While I personally tend to just make updated packages, one of the
+> reasons I thought people used /usr/local was to install newer/patched
+> versions of system provided binaries... thus what would be the point in
+> favouring the system paths over the local paths?
+
+OS (aka distro) stuff vs manually installed stuff (auto* defaulting to
+/usr/local).
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1