From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-May/015621.html | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-May/015621.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-May/015621.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-May/015621.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-May/015621.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c81362962 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-May/015621.html @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Should we update broken gajim package? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Should we update broken gajim package?

+ David Walser + luigiwalser at yahoo.com +
+ Sun May 13 19:00:24 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
A few weeks ago I added a patch from Debian to the gajim package to fix three security issues.  It turns out their patch had multiple regression-causing errors which they have not since fixed yet.  The security issues are also fixed in the newest stable release of gajim.  Should we update it to the newest version now to fix the patch regressions?
+
+Reference:
+http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668038
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1