From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013276.html | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013276.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013276.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013276.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013276.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..dc4489678 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013276.html @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] lighttpd and others now require apache + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] lighttpd and others now require apache

+ Guillaume Rousse + guillomovitch at gmail.com +
+ Tue Mar 20 17:48:06 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
Le 17/03/2012 03:22, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
+> Hence I suggest a single user id to be used. (I'm fine with any other
+> solution which works as well)
+My main concern is the fuzziness of the current situation where we have
+- one virtual package 'webserver' corresponding to four implementations 
+(apache, lightpd, nginx, cherooke)
+- one common base (webserver-base) only used by the two first ones
+- all our web applications packages using 'apache' as mandatory dependency
+
+If the main concern is file ownership, I'd propose for the next release 
+to have each of these servers use a distinct uid, document root and 
+index page, but use a shared 'webserver' or 'www' gid, and ensure all of 
+those applications use group-based permission, instead of user-based. 
+I'd find this setup a bit clearer.
+
+-- 
+BOFH excuse #339:
+
+manager in the cable duct
+
+ + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1