From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013167.html | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013167.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013167.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013167.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013167.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..20b1aa3d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013167.html @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] lighttpd and others now require apache + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] lighttpd and others now require apache

+ Anssi Hannula + anssi at mageia.org +
+ Fri Mar 16 14:29:10 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
16.03.2012 11:02, Guillaume Rousse kirjoitti:
+> Le 16/03/2012 03:01, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
+>>> So I'd rather revert the change, and make lighttpd autonomous also.
+>>> Unless someone can convince me there is an advantage having lighttpd
+>>> executing as 'apache' :)
+>>
+>> The web applications policy has files being owned by 'apache' user, and
+>> I don't see how that could work if lighttpd used a different user:
+>> https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Web_applications_policy
+> This policy was crafted with apache in mind only, not all available web
+> servers. And its explicitely refers to apache integration, not generic
+> webserver compatibility. For instance, the configuration file provided
+> is apache-specific. Even if we have compatible file permissions, and if
+> we asked packagers to also provide a default lighttpd configuration file
+> (slighly more work), that would still be mostly theorical compatibility
+> without actual testing from the packagers (many more work).
+> 
+> So, rather than a potential compatibility, without documented limits,
+> should we rather not make clear than adapting our web applications
+> package to any other web server than apache is fully up to the end user ?
+
+It is rather easy for the user to create a lighttpd configuration file
+themselves etc, however it is much more difficult for the user to start
+changing/guessing the needed file permissions for the larger applications.
+
+Also, any changes would be overwritten by any upgrade, which is quite
+bad IMO.
+
+(and yes, I do have seen actual users using lighttpd with our webapp
+packages)
+
+-- 
+Anssi Hannula
+
+ + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1