From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012922.html | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012922.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012922.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012922.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012922.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ba181e37e --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012922.html @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] [Freeze] please let in xonotic + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] [Freeze] please let in xonotic

+ Pascal Terjan + pterjan at gmail.com +
+ Sun Mar 11 13:56:43 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
On Mar 11, 2012 12:38 PM, "Oliver Burger" <oliver.bgr at googlemail.com> wrote:
+>
+> 2012/3/11 Sander Lepik <sander.lepik at eesti.ee>:
+> > It's a new package. How much harm can it do? I would understand this
+> > rejection if we would have backports enabled. But we don't. Some point
+> > release can cause more trouble than this package. This is getting
+> > ridiculous.
+> I have to agree with Sander here. In the meeting someone asked if
+> submitting new packages would still be able and the answer was
+> something like
+> "Yes, but we would prefer you to focus on fixing bugs".
+> Of course focusing on fixing bugs is a good thing, but we are still
+> almost two months before release and the fact that we don't have
+> backports (and probably never will :/ ) is a big problem.
+
+As far as I know only packages with different version are rejected by your
+I, not new ones.
+-------------- next part --------------
+An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
+URL: </pipermail/mageia-dev/attachments/20120311/b542d619/attachment-0001.html>
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1