From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012594.html | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012594.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012594.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012594.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012594.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3d9795efc --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012594.html @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] oce (opencascade) license issues + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] oce (opencascade) license issues

+ Barry Jackson + zen25000 at zen.co.uk +
+ Sun Mar 4 13:23:56 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
On 04/03/12 11:01, Michael Scherer wrote:
+>
+> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458974
+> ( notably the comment from #10 ). I would push this to non-free, because
+> that would be a problem for a company.
+
+OK - Is that:  "--define section=non-free/release" (I never used that 
+before)
+
+What about the license field in the spec? I suspect that the BS will 
+reject anything that issues an rpmlint warning - and everything I have 
+tried so far does. e.g. "LGPL-like"
+
+I am also somewhat confused by the modular approach used by Debian to 
+package this. It seems over-complicated, but I may be missing the point.
+I opted for a single library, -devel and main.
+Any thoughts on this?
+
+The object is to provide needed Requires/BuildRequires for FreeCAD which 
+I am also working on.
+
+Barry
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1