From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012470.html | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012470.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012470.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012470.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012470.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5998296e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012470.html @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] executable libraries + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] executable libraries

+ Maarten Vanraes + alien at rmail.be +
+ Thu Mar 1 22:22:37 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
I noticed that on my system, some libraries are marked executable and others 
+aren't.
+
+I know that certain libraries are executable, like libc, but i figure that this 
+is rather the exception rather than the rule.
+
+I wonder if we should have some kind of policy about this?
+
+I can be wrong, but i didn't think it's necessary to make libraries as 
+executable?
+
+I don't want any bikeshedding, but what do you think? is such a policy useful? 
+or not?
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1