From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016760.html | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016760.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016760.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016760.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016760.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3daa50929 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016760.html @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media

+ AL13N + alien at rmail.be +
+ Fri Jun 22 20:11:58 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
Op vrijdag 22 juni 2012 19:38:05 schreef Sander Lepik:
+> 22.06.2012 19:29, Claire Robinson kirjutas:
+> > On 22/06/12 17:00, AL13N wrote:
+> >> Op vrijdag 22 juni 2012 14:46:17 schreef Sander Lepik:
+> >>> Yes, that's what happens when you use backports. But this case can be
+> >>> solved. Person having this problem will install X-foo from backports and
+> >>> case is probably closed (yes! this is what you have to do if you are
+> >>> using
+> >>> backports). If not then s/he is still on his/her own as we are dealing
+> >>> with
+> >>> backports. It's not something you can make bulletproof (and we really
+> >>> shouldn't waste too much time on it).
+> >> 
+> >> which is exactly my point, this is not being "supported" at all...
+> > 
+> > Perhaps "tested" is a better word :)
+> 
+> +1, tested sounds a lot better. "Tested by QA" and that's it :)
+
+ok, i guess when people said, supported, i immediately assumed full support. 
+that kind of misled me.
+
+tested by QA, ok. but we still can't guarantee that it won't be installable 
+without error, or even that update might not be installable due to an 
+installed backport.
+
+In any case, not something i'll recommend to people, and as such, i don't 
+think there's a need for mgaapplet to handle backport functionality either.
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1