From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016756.html | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 100 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016756.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016756.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016756.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016756.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8b701e650 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016756.html @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media

+ Sander Lepik + sander.lepik at eesti.ee +
+ Fri Jun 22 18:34:54 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
22.06.2012 18:59, AL13N kirjutas:
+> Op vrijdag 22 juni 2012 11:58:10 schreef Claire Robinson:
+>> I think you are misunderstanding the kind of support we can offer for
+>> backports. See Thomas's email. We will test a package installs and
+>> works. We don't plan on supporting updates against already installed
+>> backports, at least none that I'm aware of and if so then we maybe ought
+>> to rethink opening backports altogether.
+> exactly, at this point, since noone thinks having supported backports is 
+> feasably, i think we should just have backports being unsupported, less QA 
+> that way too.
+We support them only that much that they can be installed and basic functionality works (and
+this was needed because at Mandriva times some backports just didn't work at all and so
+backports got bad reputation - we wanted to fix that part). For me it never was more than that.
+
+--
+Sander
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1