From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016709.html | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 120 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016709.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016709.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016709.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016709.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c72639551 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016709.html @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media

+ AL13N + alien at rmail.be +
+ Thu Jun 21 17:36:05 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
[...]
+> A. fetch dependencies only from enabled release/update repositories
+> Problems:
+>  - patch doesn't exist yet and code complexity is alot higher
+>  - if backports are enabled, a dependency fetched from release could
+> conflict with other installed (from backports or other). thus the update
+> would fail.
+>
+> Solutions for this:
+>  - this is not cleanly solvable, we would have to remove the backport.
+[...]
+
+In this thread at the moment, I see mostly people having (personal
+preference) problems with how i would solve this bug.
+
+while they aren't less important, what I would rather see in this thread
+is alternative solutions, or how the problem with A can be solved if it
+happens.
+
+even if both A and B are regarded as bad, I'd even prefer people to say
+that B is the lesser evil.
+
+complaining on how B is not good for you, doesn't get us anywhere with
+this bug.
+
+So please, give alternative solutions or state how A is perfectly viable.
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1