From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016678.html | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 122 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016678.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016678.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016678.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016678.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b3647cc86 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016678.html @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] packaging amrwb ? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] packaging amrwb ?

+ nicolas vigier + boklm at mars-attacks.org +
+ Wed Jun 20 14:13:11 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Simple w wrote:
+
+> 2012/6/20 Oliver Burger <oliver.bgr at googlemail.com>:
+> > Am 20.06.2012 12:45, schrieb Simple w:
+> >
+> >> about faac was already discussed, but i dont understand why amrwb
+> >> wasnt packaged so that apps can be build against it, it exists in svn,
+> >> could anyone please clarify?
+> >>
+> >> I see that amrwd doesnt have the same problems that faac has, so it
+> >> could easily go to the non-free repository since its under a
+> >> commercial license.
+> >
+> > According to wikipedia it's patented as well. So it's the same issue.
+> 
+> Appears to be different from faac case, because this one doesnt have a
+> GPL license, so it could be in non-free repository.
+
+It seems the license doesn't allow distribution of compiled versions,
+so it's not suitable for nonfree repository.
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1