From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016536.html | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 154 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016536.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016536.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016536.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016536.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..209603e96 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016536.html @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] unpackaged files lurking in the weeds + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] unpackaged files lurking in the weeds

+ Colin Guthrie + mageia at colin.guthr.ie +
+ Fri Jun 15 16:00:48 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
'Twas brillig, and D.Morgan at 15/06/12 14:38 did gyre and gimble:
+> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:23 PM, David Walser <luigiwalser at yahoo.com> wrote:
+>> --- On Fri, 6/15/12, Colin Guthrie <mageia at colin.guthr.ie> wrote:
+>>> From: Colin Guthrie <mageia at colin.guthr.ie>
+>>> Subject: Re: [Mageia-dev] unpackaged files lurking in the weeds
+>>> To: "Mageia development mailing-list" <mageia-dev at mageia.org>
+>>> Cc: "David Walser" <luigiwalser at yahoo.com>
+>>> Date: Friday, June 15, 2012, 4:53 AM
+>>> 'Twas brillig, and David Walser at
+>>> 15/06/12 01:42 did gyre and gimble:
+>>>> So, maybe we should do something about this.  My
+>>> preference would
+>>>> have rpm still complain about unpackaged %excluded
+>>> files, but not
+>>>> die, just give a warning instead.
+>>>
+>>> Personally, I don't see the point in using %exclude to
+>>> exclude files
+>>> completely from all sub packages. We can just use "rm" in
+>>> the the
+>>> %install section for that (we typically already do that to
+>>> remove *.la
+>>> files for example).
+>>>
+>>> So for me %exclude should only operate on subpackage file
+>>> list and
+>>> should only be useful to undo any wildcard inclusions:
+>>>
+>>> e.g.
+>>> %files
+>>> %{_libdir}/foo/*
+>>> %exclude %{_libdir}/foo/something-in-another-sub-package
+>>>
+>>> %files -n sub
+>>> %{_libdir}/foo/something-in-another-sub-package
+>>>
+>>>
+>>> That kind of thing.
+>>>
+>>> That, to me, seems most logical. I'm not sure what the
+>>> upstream
+>>> behaviour is, but I would agree that we should follow it all
+>>> the same
+>>> even if the goal would be to push for upstream changes when
+>>> needed.
+>>>
+>>> Cheers
+>>>
+>>> Col
+>>
+>> So, if we want to follow Colin's suggestion, we drop the patch.  The patch changes upstream behavior, and adds the extra usage of %exclude, which as Colin and I pointed out, you can just rm things in %install (or patch Makefiles) instead.
+> 
+> WE DON'T USE ANY PATCH FOR THIS AND WE USE UPSTREAM %EXCLUDE BEHAVIOUR
+> 
+> i wrote in big letters to be sure everybody reads well.
+
+
+:)
+
+Yeah, that patch hasn't existed in our code for a long time it seems.
+
+Both rpm in mga1 and in mga2 don't have it applied. The link David sent
+originally is an old release it seems.
+
+
+Col
+
+
+-- 
+
+Colin Guthrie
+colin(at)mageia.org
+http://colin.guthr.ie/
+
+Day Job:
+  Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/
+Open Source:
+  Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/
+  PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/
+  Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/
+
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1