From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016369.html | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 146 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016369.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016369.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016369.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016369.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..fc88285fc --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016369.html @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] openssl regression + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] openssl regression

+ Colin Guthrie + mageia at colin.guthr.ie +
+ Mon Jun 11 12:54:36 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
'Twas brillig, and Sander Lepik at 11/06/12 11:44 did gyre and gimble:
+> On Jun 11, 2012 1:14 PM, "Colin Guthrie" <mageia at colin.guthr.ie
+> <mailto:mageia at colin.guthr.ie>> wrote:
+>>
+>> 'Twas brillig, and Guillaume Rousse at 11/06/12 10:19 did gyre and gimble:
+>> > Le 11/06/2012 09:56, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
+>> >> Well it the .so name does not change then it *should* be ABI
+> compatible.
+>> >> It seems in this case it's only API compatible but that doesn't
+> rule out
+>> >> certain values, macros or flags changing such that everything needs a
+>> >> recompile.
+>> > Just rebuilding openssl with different build options already triggered
+>> > such kind of issues. I remember adding SNI support broke ntp in the
+>> > past, until this last package was rebuilt. The safe way should be to
+>> > rebuild everything right now, but given than almost everything in the
+>> > distribution uses this library, I think just letting normal update flow
+>> > should be enough, unless actual problems are found.
+>>
+>> Probably true and I think we should ensure that a full rebuild is done
+>> before the beta cycle anwyay. We did moot this for mga2 but it was
+>> deemed (correctly IMO) too late to start messing with that.
+>>
+>> But until then a full rebuild is likely overkill.
+> What about gcc 4.7? I think we should switch to that one as well. And
+> then rebuild is needed anyway. So full rebuild at the moment is probably
+> not the best idea.
+
++1
+
+
+-- 
+
+Colin Guthrie
+colin(at)mageia.org
+http://colin.guthr.ie/
+
+Day Job:
+  Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/
+Open Source:
+  Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/
+  PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/
+  Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/
+
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1