From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016301.html | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016301.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016301.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016301.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016301.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..67ac6bbcd --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016301.html @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion) + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)

+ AL13N + alien at rmail.be +
+ Fri Jun 8 21:05:41 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
Op vrijdag 8 juni 2012 20:40:04 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
+> Le vendredi 8 juin 2012 16:58:24, andre999 a écrit :
+[...]
+> > But wouldn't current tools update backports if backports are active ?
+> 
+> No, they wouldn't :)
+
+but isn't this a bug? just like nonfree/tainted... etc...
+
+code to detect what you had and use it for next upgrade, would be good. but 
+that would not be easy, unless we just keep it simple and fallback if people 
+don't have a standard layout.
+
+In any case,
+
+Stormi: what is your suggestion to change in the backport policy? or do you 
+think we can keep it, but we'd need alot more effort for some "features"?
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1