[Mageia-dev] bug, omission or feature

Sun Jun 3 14:04:07 CEST 2012

2012/6/3 Jani Välimaa <jani.valimaa at gmail.com>:
+> On 03.06.2012 14:35, Richard Couture wrote:
+>> I am a bit confused by your message... I sent my message with a new and
+>> unique Subject, How is that considered hijacking a thread? Am I missing
+>> the point?
+>>
+>
+> New and unique subject isn't always enough. There's still some headers
+> from message which you presumably used with Reply button to get mailing
+> list address and then erased the message box.
+>
+> To: Mageia development mailing-list <mageia-dev at mageia.org>
+> References: <4FCB1DA9.1070308 at gmail.com>
+> In-Reply-To: <4FCB1DA9.1070308 at gmail.com>
+
+Well, normally I do not look at the extended header. In my mailer the
+message by Richard came in as new message, not within an older thread.
+That's why I also replied that I do not see any hijacked Thread.
+
+Looking at the references show 2 references but i never received the
+mails with these references.
+
+-- 
+wobo
+
+>>
+>> On 06/03/2012 06:30 AM, Jani Välimaa wrote:
+>>> On 03.06.2012 14:27, Richard Couture wrote:
+>>>> I notice that when, at the end of the installation of MGA2, I select the
+>>>> level of security as HIGH, that I am permitted entry into the system in
+>>>> Linux Single mode without a challenge password, which is a new, and IMHO
+>>>> undesirable, behavior from previous versions.
+>>>>
+>>>> Is this a new feature, or have I stumbled upon a bug?
+>>>>
+>>>> The /etc/inittab does have ~~:S:wait:/sbin/sulogin in it but I can get
+>>>> in without a password... Must be something new in system D
+>>>>
+>>>
+>>> This is a bit off topic, but please don't hijack threads.
+>>
+>
+