From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-July/017273.html | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-July/017273.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-July/017273.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-July/017273.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-July/017273.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8ede87e6a --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-July/017273.html @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Last few packages with old udev dep... aka drop chromium-browser-unstable? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Last few packages with old udev dep... aka drop chromium-browser-unstable?

+ D.Morgan + dmorganec at gmail.com +
+ Wed Jul 11 15:59:50 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Colin Guthrie <mageia at colin.guthr.ie> wrote:
+> 'Twas brillig, and D.Morgan at 11/07/12 09:07 did gyre and gimble:
+>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Colin Guthrie <mageia at colin.guthr.ie> wrote:
+>>> Hi Guys,
+>>>
+>>> There are a couple packages left still needing the old udev library and
+>>> I'd like to get them sorted now.
+>>>
+>>> [colin at jimmy ~]$ urpmq --whatrequires lib64udev0 libudev0
+>>> chromium-browser-unstable
+>>> chromium-browser-unstable
+>>> enna
+>>> enna
+>>> lib64udev0
+>>> lib64zypp901
+>>> libmyth0.24
+>>> libudev0
+>>> libzypp901
+>>>
+>>>
+>>> All the libs can be ignored as they are all no longer needed, so it's
+>>> just enna and chromium-browser-unstable.
+>>>
+>>> For enna, it needs fixes for (I think) new GCC or newer libvalhalla, so
+>>> it would be great if someone could look at that. I'm not familiar with
+>>> the project, but I did find some references that it's more or less
+>>> deprecated now (Geebox seems to have switched to xbmc as it's primary
+>>> frontend:
+>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/geexbox-devel/VC3WFx2h9ws)
+>>>
+>>> For chromium-browser-unstable I propose we just drop it. We can keep the
+>>> -stable chromium named as it is just now although I would personally
+>>> prefer to see it just called "chromium-browser" (as no other package has
+>>> this strange naming policy and arguably many of them could if we shipped
+>>> two versions). I don't see a problem re-introducing an -unstable variant
+>>> again in the future, but unless someone is actively maintaining it it's
+>>> arguably just getting in the way.
+>>>
+>>> Thoughts?
+>>>
+>>> (CC'ed TV as he has been the most frequent committed to -unstable of late)
+>>>
+>>> Col
+>>
+>> i will update it soon ( today i hope )
+>
+> Cool. I presume you mean the crhomium bit?
+>
+> What about the enna? Anyone know anything about that?
+>
+> Col
+
+yes chromium :)
+
+ + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1