From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-July/017220.html | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-July/017220.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-July/017220.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-July/017220.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-July/017220.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..522814705 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-July/017220.html @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] gphoto update for MGA2 + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] gphoto update for MGA2

+ D.Morgan + dmorganec at gmail.com +
+ Sun Jul 8 00:03:14 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 11:59 PM, AL13N <alien at rmail.be> wrote:
+> Op zaterdag 7 juli 2012 10:47:35 schreef Colin Guthrie:
+>> Hi,
+>>
+>> Before MGA2 a few users complained that their camera didn't work.
+>>
+>> https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4177
+>>
+>>
+>> Should we update gphoto and libgphoto on mga2 now the dust has settled.
+>> I don't know much about upstream here but it seems like a fairly safe
+>> option and it would add support for newer cameras etc. which users will
+>> genuinely find useful!
+>
+> Isn't this better fitted for backports?
+
+as this is to fix something that doesn't work updates seems better
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1