From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011650.html | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 114 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011650.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011650.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011650.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011650.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9727424e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011650.html @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] stardict 3.0.3 + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] stardict 3.0.3

+ Kamil Rytarowski + n54 at gmx.com +
+ Mon Jan 30 21:20:13 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
W dniu 30.01.2012 20:53, Claire Revillet pisze:
+> Le 30/01/2012 17:55, Kamil Rytarowski a écrit :
+>> Hello!
+>>
+>> W dniu 30.01.2012 14:33, Funda Wang pisze:
+>>> Personally, i'm in favour of dropping it, due to what is said in its 
+>>> homepage:
+>>> StarDict hasn't seen any active development for many years
+>> Well it's worth to consider importing goldentict too, but I'm against 
+>> dropping stardict - it's actually alive and people keep porting it to 
+>> GTK3. https://code.google.com/p/stardict-3/updates/list
+> Hi
+>
+> What about asking his (her) opinion to the maintainer *before* 
+> upgrading it to the "new" version ?
+>
+> ********
+>
+>   + kamil<kamil>
+>     - new versdion 3.0.3
+>     - disable all patches, they seem merged
+>     - update URL
+>     - update SOURCE
+> **********
+>
+> As the maintainer, it was to me to take the decision to upgrade or 
+> propose something else for mageia.
+Hi Claire!
+
+I keep updating URLs and SOURCEs - the initial bug-request was there 
+https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3035 (I have reviewed initially 
+2,500 source-packages).
+>
+> You have the right to ask me what I want to do with it and to expose 
+> your opinion. But next time, ask the maintainer before ! There was no 
+> bugreport open for stardict, so no emergency to touch this package.
+>
+> And in case you are no aware of the fact we have a database for 
+> maintainership :
+> mgarepo maintdb get<package_name>
+> do the trick.
+I was informed that this mostly means that you are responsible for 
+decisions what to do in future with a package, and you are ready to be 
+assigned in a bug-request etc.
+
+So what do you think about the future of StarDICT? I was looking at the 
+projects and I'm a little bit affraid of the licenses and patents. For 
+example GoldenDict is said to support Babylon - and this can be 
+problematic with patents.
+
+Have you reviewed the dicts if they are legally used?
+>
+> Claire
+>
+>
+
+
+ + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1