From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011426.html | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011426.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011426.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011426.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011426.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2773ced7c --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011426.html @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Is mageia a bit slow? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Is mageia a bit slow?

+ Michel Catudal + michelcatudal at gmail.com +
+ Wed Jan 18 13:53:15 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
Last night I compiled mips-sde-elf-gcc on Scientific Linux AMD64 and it took about 2hrs 10 minutes. When I compiled it on mageia it took close to 3 hours.
+gcc is told to use all 4 cores on both. Scientific Linux is version 6.0 with the latest updates. gcc is gcc-4.4.5-6.el6.x86_64.
+Mageia is the latest released version, not the beta.
+
+Any clue what is responsible for the speed issue on magia? Scientific Linux or Redhat Enterprise superior or newer gcc slower?
+I haven't tested on Fedora 15 or 16 yet. I will eventually test it on gentoo, I haven't used gentoo since my gnome update switched it to gnome 3.
+I need to find a way to install mate on it to make it usable again.
+
+Michel
+
+-- 
+For OS/2 and Linux Software visit
+http://home.comcast.net/~mcatudal
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1