From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011411.html | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011411.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011411.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011411.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011411.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b7d33f0e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011411.html @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Mozilla is switching to MPLv2 + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Mozilla is switching to MPLv2

+ Romain d'Alverny + rdalverny at gmail.com +
+ Tue Jan 17 09:45:33 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:10, Florian Hubold <doktor5000 at arcor.de> wrote:
+> Am 17.01.2012 01:20, schrieb Kamil Rytarowski:
+>> Please be aware of licenses.
+>>
+>> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/12/01/06/1752240/mozilla-public-license-20-released
+>>
+>> https://www.mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/
+>> https://wiki.mozilla.org/MPL_Upgrade
+>>
+> It essentially means that the current triple-licensing will
+> be removed in favour of MPLv2 only, which in turn means mozilla
+> stuff can't be linked anymore to GPL stuff, IIUC.
+
+Yes it can. See
+https://wiki.mozilla.org/MPL_Upgrade#Why_is_it_better.3F and
+https://wiki.mozilla.org/MPL_Upgrade#What_will_be_the_difference_in_terms_of_forward_licence_compatibility.3F
+
+> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#MPL
+
+Beware, now, it's
+https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#MPL-2.0 we're talking
+about.
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1