From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011356.html | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011356.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011356.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011356.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011356.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c23e37f1e --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011356.html @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] FireFox ESR <= we should totally go for this wrt stable releases + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] FireFox ESR <= we should totally go for this wrt stable releases

+ Jeff Robins + jeffrobinssae at gmail.com +
+ Sat Jan 14 02:03:49 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Maarten Vanraes <alien at rmail.be> wrote:
+
+> Op zaterdag 14 januari 2012 01:10:48 schreef Jeff Robins:
+> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Maarten Vanraes <alien at rmail.be> wrote:
+> > > "your logic is flawed"
+> > >
+> > > Yes it was.
+> >
+> > When I read the text I was thinking of a new FF ESR every year, with an
+> > extra 2-3months of support, after the new one is released.  The graphic
+> > makes it pretty clear that it's a new FF ESR every 8-9months.  The
+> sentence
+> > below is what caused my initial confusion:
+> >
+> > "The ESR will be updated to a new major version about once a year . . . "
+> >
+> > Sorry,
+> >
+> > Jeff
+>
+> thanks for letting me be Spock :-D
+>
+Welcome
+-------------- next part --------------
+An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
+URL: </pipermail/mageia-dev/attachments/20120113/942f3571/attachment.html>
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1