From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011272.html | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011272.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011272.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011272.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011272.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..384c02f36 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011272.html @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] imported .src.rpm / .spec attribution + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] imported .src.rpm / .spec attribution

+ Buchan Milne + bgmilne at staff.telkomsa.net +
+ Thu Jan 12 09:51:48 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
On Wednesday, 11 January 2012 23:58:55 Florent Monnier wrote:
+
+> I have also noticed that several Mageia packagers don't do any proper
+> attribution to the original authors of the spec files when importing. Is it
+> considered optional ?
+
+In my case, I am mostly importing my own packages from Mageia, or entirely new 
+packages ...
+
+Maybe you could provide examples.
+
+> because when I was a Mandriva packager, when I was
+> importing Fedora spec files and debian patches I have been asked by them to
+> make this proper attribution when importing. Why is it considered optional
+> when it comes from Mandriva ?
+
+Because many maintainers here maintained packages at Mandriva, and they would 
+effectively attribute the package to themself?
+
+Regards,
+Buchan
+
+ + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1