From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011058.html | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011058.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011058.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011058.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011058.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6c86aae6d --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011058.html @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Orphans - those poor orphans . . . + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Orphans - those poor orphans . . .

+ Sander Lepik + sander.lepik at eesti.ee +
+ Fri Jan 6 20:57:39 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
06.01.2012 21:06, Dale Huckeby kirjutas:
+>
+> Evidently once I've installed package A which requests X, sometimes packages
+> F, L, and T might subsequently get installed which also need X *and presumably
+> would have requested it had it not already been installed*.  But when I uninstall
+> A it orphans X because A is the only package that *requested* it.  When F, L,
+> and T are installed can't all the packages they *would have requested* be marked
+> whether or not they're already installed?  That way a package would be orphaned
+> only when the last package that needs it is uninstalled?  Or am I missing
+> something?
+This is already so. See example: http://pastebin.com/AMj87QiV - after first urpme 
+libplasmaweather4 should be marked as orphan but it's not as it's still required by other 
+package.
+
+--
+Sander
+
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1