From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000
Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives

---
 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/010958.html | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 131 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/010958.html

(limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/010958.html')

diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/010958.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/010958.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..0093ed9d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/010958.html
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] RFC: task-obsolete and README.*.urpmi enhancement
+   </TITLE>
+   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20RFC%3A%20task-obsolete%20and%20README.%2A.urpmi%20enhancement&In-Reply-To=%3C4F04A4EF.3080501%40free.fr%3E">
+   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="010952.html">
+   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="010980.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+   <H1>[Mageia-dev] RFC: task-obsolete and README.*.urpmi enhancement</H1>
+    <B>Luc Menut</B> 
+    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20RFC%3A%20task-obsolete%20and%20README.%2A.urpmi%20enhancement&In-Reply-To=%3C4F04A4EF.3080501%40free.fr%3E"
+       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] RFC: task-obsolete and README.*.urpmi enhancement">lmenut at free.fr
+       </A><BR>
+    <I>Wed Jan  4 20:13:51 CET 2012</I>
+    <P><UL>
+        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="010952.html">[Mageia-dev] RFC: task-obsolete and README.*.urpmi enhancement
+</A></li>
+        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="010980.html">[Mageia-dev] RFC: task-obsolete and README.*.urpmi enhancement
+</A></li>
+         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
+              <a href="date.html#10958">[ date ]</a>
+              <a href="thread.html#10958">[ thread ]</a>
+              <a href="subject.html#10958">[ subject ]</a>
+              <a href="author.html#10958">[ author ]</a>
+         </LI>
+       </UL>
+    <HR>  
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Le 04/01/2012 17:20, Guillaume Rousse a &#233;crit :
+&gt;&gt;<i> 1) add support for optional README.*.urpmi (%ghost in spec):
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> This will allow to build this README.*.urpmi at install time in %pre,
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> %post or %trigger only when it's necessary.
+</I>&gt;<i> That will create files on the system unknown from rpm database, and
+</I>&gt;<i> unknown from urpmi too.
+</I>
+nope, %ghost files are known from rpm database.
+rpm -qpl task-obsolete-1-1.mga2.noarch.rpm
+/usr/share/doc/task-obsolete
+/usr/share/doc/task-obsolete/README.null-dummy.obsolete.urpmi
+/usr/share/doc/task-obsolete/README.null.obsolete.urpmi
+
+
+&gt;<i> Rather than focusing on shiny automatic display mechanisms, I'd rather
+</I>&gt;<i> work on information content.
+</I>
+we can|should do both.
+
+[...]
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Here are a few proposal of mines to make the situation better:
+</I>&gt;<i> - use a unique file name, enforced by convention, rather than references
+</I>&gt;<i> in package description, the same way Debian does with README.debian
+</I>&gt;<i> - display its content only in graphical context: command-line users
+</I>&gt;<i> usually know about this kind of convention to get information themselves
+</I>&gt;<i> - use standardised file content and markup to allow rpmdrake and other
+</I>&gt;<i> graphical tools to achieve the same kind of selection than file
+</I>&gt;<i> splitting today
+</I>&gt;<i> - define some kind of policy of what should be there, and what should
+</I>&gt;<i> not, to achieve minimal consistency
+</I>
+I'm not particularly attached at the current system, but I find it works 
+rather well.
+If we want that users read informations, the information should be 
+relevant in the context (too many informations, kill information);
+e.g. it's useless (personnaly, I consider it's bad) to display 
+information about install when we update a package, and vice versa (I 
+don't know debian, and if the unique file README.debian allow this).
+
+Luc
+
+-- 
+Luc Menut
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+    <HR>
+    <P><UL>
+        <!--threads-->
+	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="010952.html">[Mageia-dev] RFC: task-obsolete and README.*.urpmi enhancement
+</A></li>
+	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="010980.html">[Mageia-dev] RFC: task-obsolete and README.*.urpmi enhancement
+</A></li>
+         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
+              <a href="date.html#10958">[ date ]</a>
+              <a href="thread.html#10958">[ thread ]</a>
+              <a href="subject.html#10958">[ subject ]</a>
+              <a href="author.html#10958">[ author ]</a>
+         </LI>
+       </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>
-- 
cgit v1.2.1