From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/012405.html | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/012405.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/012405.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/012405.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/012405.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ed8626ab4 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/012405.html @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release dovecot-1.2.17-3.mga2 + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release dovecot-1.2.17-3.mga2

+ Maarten Vanraes + alien at rmail.be +
+ Mon Feb 27 20:07:48 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
Op maandag 27 februari 2012 09:20:17 schreef Guillaume Rousse:
+> Le 27/02/2012 08:00, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
+> > Is it necessary to have these --with[out]* compile flags in the package
+> > description?
+> 
+> maybe not necessary, but definitively useful.
+> 
+> > maybe it'd be better to just list whatever support it has been built
+> > with.
+> 
+> It has been a standard practice for all our packages allowing
+> conditional build options for quite a long time. Of course, this could
+> be mentioned elsewhere as package description.
+
+i have no problem it being in the spec file, but surely a better place rather 
+than the description... it's not like users really need to know which compile 
+flags there is or what you can do with rpmbuild...
+
+i'm just saying this info should be moved out to comments in spec file, and 
+change the description to state what exactly is compiled in...
+
+ + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1