From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/011893.html | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/011893.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/011893.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/011893.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/011893.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..edbdea56c --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/011893.html @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] procps / procps-ng + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] procps / procps-ng

+ David Walser + luigiwalser at yahoo.com +
+ Sun Feb 12 17:50:06 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
Pascal Terjan wrote:
+> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 16:13, D.Morgan <dmorganec at gmail.com> wrote:
+>> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:05 AM, David Walser <luigiwalser at yahoo.com> wrote:
+>>> There is a fork of procps called procps-ng, which I think lives here:
+>>> http://www.ohloh.net/p/procps-ng
+>>>
+>>> Debian has switched to using it, as can be seen here:
+>>> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/p/procps/procps_3.3.2-3/changelog
+>>>
+>>> Should we switch to it as well, or stick with procps?
+>>
+>> i have not yet looked, but what fedora did ?
+> 
+> https://gitorious.org/procps says "Debian, Fedora and openSUSE fork of procps."
+
+Yes, and the Fedora git shows they have switched to it, although they forgot to update the version number.
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1