From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/011737.html | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/011737.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/011737.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/011737.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/011737.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..09a93fbdb --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/011737.html @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] FireFox ESR <= we should totally go for this wrt stable releases + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] FireFox ESR <= we should totally go for this wrt stable releases

+ Sander Lepik + sander.lepik at eesti.ee +
+ Mon Feb 6 08:50:21 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
06.02.2012 09:38, Funda Wang kirjutas:
+>
+> And, don't forget, we still have a package named firefox-beta. If we 
+> stick with FF10, then some day we will come to a situation of 
+> firefox-10.0.4 and firefox-beta-15b1 for Mageia 2, which is 
+> unacceptable. Or, we should make an exception on firefox-beta, it 
+> should be obsoleted by updated firefox for stable distros.
+>
+Indeed, firefox-beta must be obsoleted on stable release like chrome's 
+similar versions are as we don't have maintaner who wants to keep them 
+up-to-date on stable releases.
+I agree with D.Morgan that if we want to continue with ESR version then 
+cauldron will stay on 10.0 (not sure how we can have newer versions of 
+beta if they depend on the same packages).
+And it's also true that we will lose some users if they don't want to 
+use tarball version and will pick distro that can keep browsers 
+up-to-date. Sad, but true.
+
+(Funda, can you please stop top-posting. This is rude man!)
+
+--
+Sander
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1