From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-December/020817.html | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-December/020817.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-December/020817.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-December/020817.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-December/020817.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5cdc0c9f7 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-December/020817.html @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] *.so files are text in some packages messing up provides (was: Re: abrt+libreport) + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] *.so files are text in some packages messing up provides (was: Re: abrt+libreport)

+ AL13N + alien at rmail.be +
+ Sun Dec 16 14:47:43 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
Op zondag 16 december 2012 11:11:48 schreef Colin Guthrie:
+> 'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 15/12/12 22:05 did gyre and gimble:
+> > 'Twas brillig, and Thierry Vignaud at 12/12/12 10:38 did gyre and gimble:
+> >> On 11 December 2012 17:52, Colin Guthrie <mageia at colin.guthr.ie> wrote:
+> >>> I have updated versions of these packages (part of my /var/run updates)
+> >>> locally. Can I submit them? It updates both to the latest upstream, but
+> >>> I have no real way to test it properly.
+> >> 
+> >> You could "kill -11" some rendom gtk+ appp (eg: gedit) and see if you
+> >> get a segfault dialog.
+> > 
+> > OK, so I downgraded to the current version and tried this and didn't get
+> > any dialogs...
+> > 
+> > So for want of any better testing, I've just pushed my updated versions
+> > for now.
+> > 
+> > Fingers crossed it didn't make things worse :)
+> 
+> OK, so this is happending:
+> 
+> [root at jimmy ~]# urpmi "pkgconfig(libreport-web)"
+> A requested package cannot be installed:
+> lib64report-web-devel-2.0.19-1.mga3.x86_64 (due to unsatisfied
+> devel(libxmlrpc_client(64bit)))
+> Continue installation anyway? (Y/n)
+> 
+> 
+> It turns out that "devel(libxmlrpc_client(64bit)))" is not provided by
+> lib64xmlrpc-c-devel. Looking closer this is because when building that
+> package, objdump does not recognise the file file format and thus
+> doesn't add provides. Looking closer it appears the files are txt not
+> symlinks:
+> 
+> [colin at jimmy xmlrpc-c]$ cat /usr/lib64/libxmlrpc_server.so
+> /* GNU ld script */
+> INPUT(/usr/lib64/libxmlrpc_server.so.3
+> AS_NEEDED(/usr/lib64/libxmlrpc.so.3 /usr/lib64/libxmlrpc_util.so.3))
+> 
+> 
+> So the question is, should they just be fixed to be symlinks or should
+> we teach the rpm script the ability to extract info from these these GNU
+> ld scripts?
+> 
+> Col
+
+imho, this should be fixed... what if we use a different linker? 
+will -lxmlrpc_server still work then?
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1