From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-December/020799.html | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-December/020799.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-December/020799.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-December/020799.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-December/020799.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..097dd0b97 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-December/020799.html @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] requiring postgres-devel + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] requiring postgres-devel

+ zezinho + lists.jjorge at free.fr +
+ Fri Dec 14 22:22:30 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
Le 04/12/2012 00:33, Pascal Terjan a écrit :
+> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:54 PM, zezinho<lists.jjorge at free.fr>  wrote:
+>> qlandkartegt build fails because urpmi auto-selects a different libpq and
+>> libpq-devel (eg. libpq5.1 and libpq5.2-devel) for the auto requires
+>> libpq.so.5.
+>>
+>> Any hint on how to deal with that? Should I require manually a versioned
+>> libpq AND libpq-devel?
+>
+> I think libpq5.2-devel should require libpq5.2
+
+Maybe the problem is not there : in
+/etc/urpmi/prefer.vendor.list
+
+libpq9.1_5 is preferred over libpq9.2_5
+
+Shouldn't we prefer now the newest libpq?
+
+ + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1